Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kathleen McCroskey's avatar

SS funding didn't run out - it is a binder full of I.O.U.s from govt "borrowing" (read Theft) to fund the military, etc. People take it lying down because of collective wealth - they can't risk their lifestyle by joining a real revolution. Democracy needs a smaller population, it doesn't work at scale - politics became a spectator sport: see Democrats. The system kind of works in Switzerland because of higher education and more direct involvement in the political process, and leaders who are not idolized and put on pedestals. And even, in this system, those with good ideas are set to the side, while in China, in a meritocracy, you would be on the inside, building a better nation. You can't get there from here. Total re-work required.

Frank Sterle Jr.'s avatar

I find that relatively few Democratic politicians are politically-practicing social AND fiscal progressives, with the ‘fiscal’ ensuring that everyone has access to the basic necessities of life. Those elected representatives are progressive only in regards to following/implementing ideologically neoliberal or ‘woke’ policy — primarily that involving race, sexuality, and the expanding category of gender.

Other than perhaps Barack Obama, it's doubtful any presidential contender or president — including and especially Donald Trump — has genuinely, publicly realized that Americans collectively want and deserve better than just either of the usual callous conservative or neo/faux liberal establishment candidate thus very corporate friendly president in the White House (something I believe they very likely will never get).

One almost gets the impression that the Republican and Democratic parties are still unaware of the non-corporately-commissioned polls showing that a majority of Americans favor the governmental implementation of some public programs, especially universal health care.

One would think the Democrats in particular would finally support thus implement a universal healthcare plan, so why is the DNC refusing to allow it — even if only by disallowing the fiscally progressive Senator Bernie Sanders to run as its presidential nominee, however many Democrat-voters want him? That is, other than the DNC being afraid of crossing the corporate lobbyists, especially those hired to represent the healthcare industry’s unlimited-profit interests, who make some of the largest donations to the party election coffers.

13 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?